Skip to main content

Tips for planning your research dissemination

 


The next couple of topics will relate to publishing Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) articles (though it will also apply to most other forms of research publishing). So, I thought I would give some brief info about publishing research articles in general. Here are some things to consider for disseminating research.

The publishing process actually begins well before the project itself, especially if you have any co-authors (if you’re doing everything yourself and have nobody else in your research team, then you can skip this paragraph). Determining authorship order and who will contribute in which way (and how much each will contribute) to the writing is an important step. Why does the order of the authors matter? In most fields, the author in the first position is the one who made the most substantial contribution to the project (though not necessarily to the writing, but often that is also the case). Additionally, the first author won’t get truncated when being cited. In APA, for example, a paper published by Author1, Author2, and Author 3 in 2021 would be cited as (Author 1 et al, 2021), so if you aren’t the first author, you don’t exist 😉 After well over a decade of publishing my research, I can tell you that it’s a good idea to determine this order up front because it sets out expectations for the whole project (in addition to the writing). Of course, it can change over the course of the project for various reasons, but when everyone is on the same page from the start, the research team seems to work better and people seem to have a better sense of how much they are expected to contribute and who is taking the lead. That makes the writing process much more straightforward (as well as the actual research project/data collection).

Once you’ve determined the authorship order, you should consider the type of dissemination for your research project before you begin preparing your dissemination output. For example, are you planning to share your findings by publishing an article in a journal, or presenting a talk or poster at a conference? Or perhaps you’d prefer to present what you’ve found at a Divisional or program meeting or in a community presentation (public library, elementary school PTA meeting, etc). Some journals are now offering video abstracts to accompany their traditional print articles, but you can also disseminate your findings entirely via video like these dance your PhD or 2-minute thesis.

When choosing a journal or conference (or considering other avenues for dissemination) you should give careful consideration to whether your topic/focus/results fit with the journal (or conference) and its audience because you will have a much better chance of acceptance if there is a good fit. And regardless of which type of dissemination you’re preparing, the process will take some time, so you can ask for time on your SWF for this research activity (form on ICE).

Did you know that you can present your findings at a conference and then also publish it in the form of an article but that you can’t submit your article to more than one journal at a time? Well, now you do! 😊

In all your dissemination activities, make sure that you acknowledge any funders for your research; you may also wish to thank or acknowledge members of your research team who participated but not enough to warrant authorship (e.g., student research assistant) or other entities which supported your research in non-financial ways (e.g., CTL). You may also be required to share your findings with your research participants if that was part of your Research Ethics Board (REB) application.

A final word on how to identify predatory journals. Predatory journals are exploitative journals which take advantage of authors who need to “publish or perish”. The journals do not follow academic standards for publishing such as a robust peer-review process with experts in the field. These journals publish everything that comes across their desks and do not concern themselves with quality or scientific rigor. How can you identify these journals from legitimate academic journals? First, any journal that emails you to solicit your manuscript is likely to be predatory. Of course, your previous publication is amazing, but legitimate journals receive so many submissions that they don’t need to solicit articles. Also, all predatory journals require a fee for publishing your article (that’s their business model). Sometimes a fee is required even just for submitting an article and then a larger fee is due once accepted. Legitimate journals will usually explicitly state that there is no fee to submit or publish in the journal. (Note: some legitimate journals do require authors pay if they want their article to be open access or for their tables or figures to appear in colour.) Predatory journals also have a very quick turn-around time because they aren’t sending your paper out to be reviewed (even if they advertise that they do) and/or the review is not done by experts in the field. These journals also have a very high acceptance rate (sometimes even a guaranteed acceptance policy). For more information on predatory journals, check out the DC Library Guide or Think Check Submit.

During the next two newsletters, I will provide some detailed information and tips for disseminating research and explain why doing so is so important. If there is anything I can do to support your research or if you have suggestions for me in my role as Research Coordinator, please reach out via email.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Developing a Research Question - Part 1: Generate Your Own Research Question from Scratch

  Today, I’d like to provide some guidance about research questions. This will be a two-part feature. Part 1 will include a description of research questions and guidance to help you develop your own. For Pat 2 (in 2 weeks), I will focus on how to use other sources as inspirations for your research questions. A research question is used to clarify the scope of your research project. It is a narrower version of the topic that you’re interested in studying. A good research question should be specific, include the variables you are interested in studying, and be testable in a finite amount of time. Your variables should also be operationally defined. It’s not enough to say “children” for example; you should specify “5-8-year-olds”. Similarly “do better” is not a good way to operationalize student success because it’s not easy to measure; instead, phrase it as “earn higher scores on Test 3” because that is how you will measure whether they have done better. Although specific, “When w...

What is Secondary Use Research? (Part 1 of 2)

  In previous issues, I have addressed the forms required for secondary use of data as well as how, in some cases, participants’ consent may not be required for secondary use projects. This week, I will define what a secondary use research project really is (to be continued in the next issue). In future articles, I will detail how to complete the secondary use REB form, section by section. So, what differentiates a secondary use research project from a traditional research project? The short answer is: when the data were collected. If you are proposing to collect data from participants during your study, then you’re not engaged in a research project that would fall under secondary use. If the data have already been collected, and you simply plan to use those previously-collected data in order to answer your research question, then you’d fall in the secondary use category. Essentially, a project that falls under secondary use involves harnessing past data for new research. Where do ...

Developing a Research Question; Part 2: Finding Inspiration Elsewhere

  Before we begin, a reminder that a research question is a specific, testable question that clearly identifies the variables of interest. It identifies the scope and goal of your research project. Last time, we looked at how to develop a research question from scratch. This time, I will outline some other places you can find inspiration for a research question. Your favourite journal article. Do you have a favourite journal article? Oh. It’s just me then? Okay, well…if you have ever read a journal article that you really liked, that’s a good place to start! Specifically, focus your reading on their discussion section for ideas. Most papers identify shortcomings of their research (e.g., “We couldn’t address this possible confounding variable, so we can’t provide a strong conclusion.”), gaps in the literature which still exist (e.g., “Although we showed that …it is still not clear whether….”), and/or directions for future research (“Building on this research, future studies should e...