Skip to main content

Tips for planning your research dissemination

 


The next couple of topics will relate to publishing Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) articles (though it will also apply to most other forms of research publishing). So, I thought I would give some brief info about publishing research articles in general. Here are some things to consider for disseminating research.

The publishing process actually begins well before the project itself, especially if you have any co-authors (if you’re doing everything yourself and have nobody else in your research team, then you can skip this paragraph). Determining authorship order and who will contribute in which way (and how much each will contribute) to the writing is an important step. Why does the order of the authors matter? In most fields, the author in the first position is the one who made the most substantial contribution to the project (though not necessarily to the writing, but often that is also the case). Additionally, the first author won’t get truncated when being cited. In APA, for example, a paper published by Author1, Author2, and Author 3 in 2021 would be cited as (Author 1 et al, 2021), so if you aren’t the first author, you don’t exist 😉 After well over a decade of publishing my research, I can tell you that it’s a good idea to determine this order up front because it sets out expectations for the whole project (in addition to the writing). Of course, it can change over the course of the project for various reasons, but when everyone is on the same page from the start, the research team seems to work better and people seem to have a better sense of how much they are expected to contribute and who is taking the lead. That makes the writing process much more straightforward (as well as the actual research project/data collection).

Once you’ve determined the authorship order, you should consider the type of dissemination for your research project before you begin preparing your dissemination output. For example, are you planning to share your findings by publishing an article in a journal, or presenting a talk or poster at a conference? Or perhaps you’d prefer to present what you’ve found at a Divisional or program meeting or in a community presentation (public library, elementary school PTA meeting, etc). Some journals are now offering video abstracts to accompany their traditional print articles, but you can also disseminate your findings entirely via video like these dance your PhD or 2-minute thesis.

When choosing a journal or conference (or considering other avenues for dissemination) you should give careful consideration to whether your topic/focus/results fit with the journal (or conference) and its audience because you will have a much better chance of acceptance if there is a good fit. And regardless of which type of dissemination you’re preparing, the process will take some time, so you can ask for time on your SWF for this research activity (form on ICE).

Did you know that you can present your findings at a conference and then also publish it in the form of an article but that you can’t submit your article to more than one journal at a time? Well, now you do! 😊

In all your dissemination activities, make sure that you acknowledge any funders for your research; you may also wish to thank or acknowledge members of your research team who participated but not enough to warrant authorship (e.g., student research assistant) or other entities which supported your research in non-financial ways (e.g., CTL). You may also be required to share your findings with your research participants if that was part of your Research Ethics Board (REB) application.

A final word on how to identify predatory journals. Predatory journals are exploitative journals which take advantage of authors who need to “publish or perish”. The journals do not follow academic standards for publishing such as a robust peer-review process with experts in the field. These journals publish everything that comes across their desks and do not concern themselves with quality or scientific rigor. How can you identify these journals from legitimate academic journals? First, any journal that emails you to solicit your manuscript is likely to be predatory. Of course, your previous publication is amazing, but legitimate journals receive so many submissions that they don’t need to solicit articles. Also, all predatory journals require a fee for publishing your article (that’s their business model). Sometimes a fee is required even just for submitting an article and then a larger fee is due once accepted. Legitimate journals will usually explicitly state that there is no fee to submit or publish in the journal. (Note: some legitimate journals do require authors pay if they want their article to be open access or for their tables or figures to appear in colour.) Predatory journals also have a very quick turn-around time because they aren’t sending your paper out to be reviewed (even if they advertise that they do) and/or the review is not done by experts in the field. These journals also have a very high acceptance rate (sometimes even a guaranteed acceptance policy). For more information on predatory journals, check out the DC Library Guide or Think Check Submit.

During the next two newsletters, I will provide some detailed information and tips for disseminating research and explain why doing so is so important. If there is anything I can do to support your research or if you have suggestions for me in my role as Research Coordinator, please reach out via email.

Comments